When one reads and is able to contrast Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" it clearly shows a great and perhaps the most clear example of the point that Socrates was attempting to make to the jury, in the "Apology".For example in Plato's "Allegory of the Cave", Plato makes the reader visualize a cave where there are a great number of prisoners who are restrained and are faced staring at the wall where all they can see is shadow movements that are projected from a fire that is placed right behind these prisoners, and this fire is displaying false images from what appears to be images of the outside world.Socrates is correct when he says the “the unexamined life is not worth living” In order to discuss why Socrates is correct, I would like to discuss these various points which consist of: the significance as well as the underlying meaning of his quote “the unexamined life is not worth living”, the difference between an unexamined life and an examined life, specific examples, the importance of a person living an examined life and lastly, whether or not I’m living an examined life. Socrates believed that Philosophy was primarily a social activity, which in fact he made use of quite often.
As one analyzes the "Apology" by Plato, one is able to analyze and contrast and most people would agree with Socrates when he claims that "..unexamined life is not worth living...".
From a more personal standpoint I would completely agree with Socrates point of view, due to the fact most of us in society have chosen to live the "unexamined life" for centuries and as a result we live in a society where one has to live segregated from our freewill as human beings as well as a society that is restrained by rules and other types of social "walls".
Everything that makes one happy, and a happy life should most definitely be lived whether its examined or not.
Epicurus’ philosophy on happiness, is composed of three things; good companionship (friends), having freedom (being self-sufficient and free from everyday life and politics) and an analysed life (meaning to have time and space to think things through).
He believed that human have a tendency to over-think things and that’s mainly where our unhappiness comes from.
To be happy De Montaigne knew that we didn’t need intelligence and brain facts, we required wisdom and life experience.Socrates’ statement does instigate discussion, but it doesn’t necessarily apply to everyone’s way of life and what makes or doesn’t make their life worth living.The theory that all lives that are unexamined don’t have a purpose and should not be lived is unreasonable and simply not true.Hence Socrates’ renowned statement “The unexamined life is not worth living”.Declaring that humans must scrutinize their lives in order to live a fulfilled one isn’t agreeable to any extent.De Montaigne was one of the most significant philosophers of the French Renaissance and is best known for his skepticism.De Montaigne would’ve had an advancing degree of doubt and disagreement on Socrates’ statement that “the unexamined life is not worth living”.Socrates seemed to overlook other factors that account to our happiness and give worth to our lives.In disagreement with Socrates; We all must contemplate now and again but only to a certain extent, as it can be disastrous to overthink and reconsider every aspect of our life.As the story proceeds, one of the prisoners manages to escape and as he is able to escape the cave and he walks outside into the "real" world and is able to see a completely different view of the real world and this prisoner is able to see a completely different image of the outside world, different from the images that the shadows inside the cave were exposing to the prisoners.When the escaped prisoner decides to go into the cave and attempts to explain to the other prisoners about what is really occurring in the outside world, the other prisoners decide to gain up on the "liberated" prisoner, because they were not prepared to see reality for what it really is, so they decided to chose to somewh...