A rough idea is usually one that is not well worked out, not clearly expressed, and as a result, not likely to be understood.Whether you actually do it in your paper or not, you should be able to state in a short sentence precisely what you want to prove.features thematic essay collections that explore a broad range of areas of concern, including key terms, concepts, fields, and empirical zones of inquiry; the political economy of social knowledge production; changes in the landscape of higher education and the institutional ecology of social science research; the relationship between social knowledge and its uses; and more.
It is common to overestimate the strength of your own position.
That is because you already accept that point of view. It is safest to assume that your reader is intelligent and knows a lot about your subject, but disagrees with you.
For better or for worse, your paper is all that is available. The responsibility for ensuring the accurate communication of ideas falls on the shoulders. Can he or she read your entire paper through without getting stuck on a single sentence? In general terms, do not be content simply to get your paper out of your hands. Clear writing reflects clear thinking; and that, after all, is what you are really trying to show.
You must say exactly what you mean and in a way that minimizes the chances of being misunderstood. There is no such thing as a piece of good philosophical writing that is unclear, ungrammatical, or unintelligible. A poor writing style militates against both of these.
Unfortunately, your reader (likely your marker or instructor) has no access to those thoughts except by way of what actually ends up on the page.