Cons Standardized Testing Essay

Cons Standardized Testing Essay-86
Administrators get funding and avoid harsh penalties by boosting test scores. For them, standardized testing is worthless and worse. Standardized testing creates “winners” and losers.” The losers are those who get labeled as “my low students” “my learning disabled kids,” “my reluctant learners.” Even the winners are trapped by being caught up on a tread mill of achievement that they must stay on at all costs through at least sixteen years of schooling, and more often twenty years.The losers suffer loss of self-esteem, and the damage of “low expectations” (which research shows actually negatively influences performance – the book to read is Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils’ Intellectual Development by Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson).What's also started to happen is that teachers who use the same standards and rubrics, assign the same performance tasks, and grade each other's work are finding their letter grades starting to align.

Administrators get funding and avoid harsh penalties by boosting test scores. For them, standardized testing is worthless and worse. Standardized testing creates “winners” and losers.” The losers are those who get labeled as “my low students” “my learning disabled kids,” “my reluctant learners.” Even the winners are trapped by being caught up on a tread mill of achievement that they must stay on at all costs through at least sixteen years of schooling, and more often twenty years.

Tags: Essay On Mark Twains The Damned Human RaceCreative Writing Prompts For Kids With PicturesComputer Science AssignmentUniversity Of Pittsburgh DissertationsUniversity Of Tulsa Admission EssayAbnormal Psychology Research Paper TopicsQualities Of A Good Husband EssayArticles For Research PaperCreative Writing Degree CoursesInteresting Topic For Research Paper

Given high stakes and the accompanying pressure, people will game a system.

And it is all too true that grades vary widely because of four factors: a teacher's conception of achievement, a teacher's sense of equity and rigor, a teacher's ability, and the composition of students.

Like many issues in public education, standardized testing can be a controversial topic among parents, teachers, and voters.

Many people say standardized testing provides an accurate measurement of student performance and teacher effectiveness.

The results aren’t even given back to the teachers and students until months later, and there are no instructions provided by test companies on how to improve these test scores. this original group is the “norm group” against which any future test-takers are to be compared). Standardized tests favor those who have socio-economic advantages. And when stress becomes overwhelming, the brain shifts into a “fight or flight” response, where it is impossible to engage in the higher-order thinking processes that are necessary to respond correctly to the standardized test questions. Standardized tests reduce the richness of human experience and human learning to a number or set of numbers. A student may have a deep knowledge of a particular subject, but receive no acknowledgement for it because his or her test score may have been low. Albert Einstein never created a standardized test (although he failed a number of them), and neither did any of the great thinkers of our age or any age.

Cons Standardized Testing Essay

Test companies (a multi-billion dollar a year industry) not only manufacture the tests, they also manufacture the courses and programs that can be taken to “prepare for the test.” If you have the money, you can even get special tutors that will help you do well on a test. If the student were able to draw a picture, lead a group discussion, or create a hands-on project, he/she could show that knowledge. Standardized tests are usually developed by pedantic researchers with Ph.

For example, because the No Child Left Behind Law (NCLB) only tests reading, math, and science that means that art, social studies, physical education, history, and other subjects are given far less attention than used to be the case. Standardized tests occur in an artificial learning environment: they’re timed, you can’t talk to a fellow student, you can’t ask questions, you can’t use references or learning devices, you can’t get up and move around. If a student scores well on a test, then it is assumed that they know the material. The student may have simply memorized the fact or formula or trick necessary to do well on the test (some students are naturally gifted in taking standardized tests, others are not).

A group of Harvard graduates were asked why it is colder in the winter and warmer in the summer. They were good test-takers but didn’t understand fundamental principles that required a deeper comprehension (the book to read is The Disciplined Mind: Beyond Facts and Standardized Tests; the K-12 Education that Every Child Deserves by Harvard psychologist Howard Gardner, named in a poll as one of the 100 greatest public intellectuals in the world). Standardized tests exist for administrative, political, and financial purposes, not for educational ones. Politicians get elected by promising better test results.

Ask any teacher and she can tell you which students can read and write. Locally publish a compilation of evaluation reports. Grade data means nothing because teachers apply different standards with different values. And won't this proposal create a whole new bureaucracy?

That telling usually comes in the form of letter grades or evaluations that break down progress on skills. Release a state or national report reviewed and verified by expert evaluators with legislative oversight. " All true (except for the one test being reliable).

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Cons Standardized Testing Essay

The Latest from kia-dop.ru ©