Journals can present the CRedi T taxonomy criteria (or a version of them that is appropriate for the journal) front and centre to provide a clear overview of authorship criteria.
Journals can present the CRedi T taxonomy criteria (or a version of them that is appropriate for the journal) front and centre to provide a clear overview of authorship criteria.Tags: Nowhere Man EssayAnswer My Math HomeworkLiterature Review On InvestmentMaster Thesis Statement Of The ProblemWrite Essays For Money UkEssays On Happy LifeProposal For Research ProjectI Want To Become Doctor Essay
Prior to joining AJE, Theresa worked in the non-profit sector to create both business and educational opportunities for citizens in her community.
is the Outreach and Communications Manager at Research Square (the company behind AJE), where he has worked since 2007.
Finally, recent trends in psychological science, such as the difficulty of publishing single-study papers in some subfields and the “open science” movement calling for large sample sizes, pre-registration, and replication (see Chambers, 2017; Nelson et al., 2018) can seem like roadblocks to publishing with undergraduates. “Living in parallel universes: the great faculty divide between product-oriented and process-oriented scholarship,” in Faculty Support and Undergraduate Research: Innovations in Faculty Role Definition, Workload, and Reward, eds N.
Fortunately, faculty from diverse subfields have come up with creative solutions involving high-quality replications (e.g., Mc Kelvie and Standing, 2018; Wagge et al., 2019), preregistered projects (e.g., Strand and Brown, 2019), large-scale single-experiment class projects designed for publication (e.g., Lo Schiavo, 2018; Mickley Steinmetz and Reid, 2019), and multi-study projects involving student coauthors across years (e.g., Grysman and Lodi-Smith, 2019; Holmes and Roberts, 2019). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02143 Pub Med Abstract | Cross Ref Full Text | Google Scholar Malachowski, M.
Without any data, it's hard to know for certain how common it is for undergraduates to publish as first authors, but informal discussions with psychology colleagues around the world who collaborate with undergraduates (and examinations of faculty vitae) suggest that it is far less common than undergraduates publishing as non-lead authors. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02411 Pub Med Abstract | Cross Ref Full Text | Google Scholar Maurer, T. Guidelines for authorship credit, order, and co-inquireer learning in collaborative faculty-student So TL projects.
Because it is rare to see undergraduate first authors, many faculty are likely unaware that at least some undergraduates can—with proper training, encouragement, and careful mentoring—be capable of serving as first authors on papers in refereed journals. If an authorship dispute should arise, it’s important that journals do not attempt to serve as an arbiter or intermediary.In cases where authors are unable to reach a consensus, journals should refer them to their institution(s).Researchers, or anyone else who has contributed to a paper in a meaningful way, who fall short of the requirements for authorship should still be recognised for their work if possible.Often this takes the form of an “Acknowledgments” section.It is not the journal’s role to be the judge of who is correct.Whether working on a manuscript with two or 20 authors, trying to communicate with multiple authors at once can be challenging for editors.In this paper, I specifically focus on how to guide undergraduates through the process of first authorship. After describing potential barriers, I discuss issues of authorship contribution before outlining several successful strategies I've developed during my 24 years of collaborating with undergraduates. Teaching psychology research methodology across the curriculum to promote undergraduate publication: an eight-course structure and two helpful practices. For this reason, it’s best for the editor and authors involved to establish one “corresponding author”.Journals should require the corresponding author to verify the author list with all other authors and to serve as the primary contact for all other ethical assessments.